(Solution) 5CO02 (AC2.2) Present key findings for stakeholders from people practice activities and initiatives

New User Gifts

First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.

KaribuCustomer

Original price was: $20.00.Current price is: $10.00.

Payment Methods:

Description

Solution

Table 2 Data: Line Managers and Employees’ Feedback

 

Response Strongly Agree (50 Responses) Agree (50 Responses) Disagree (50 Responses) Strongly Disagree (50 Responses)   Strongly Agree (235 Responses) Agree (235 Responses) Disagree (235 Responses) Strongly Disagree (235 Responses)
A 6.00% 58.00% 22.00% 14.00% 0.85% 47.23% 51.49% 0.43%
B 8.00% 44.00% 46.00% 2.00% 2.13% 16.60% 79.57% 1.70%
C 14.00% 58.00% 18.00% 0.00% 2.55% 60.00% 34.89% 2.55%
D 6.00% 52.00% 22.00% 20.00% 6.38% 42.13% 37.87% 13.62%
E 0.00% 0.00% 88.00% 12.00% 34.74% 33.62% 6.38% 4.26%
F 0.00% 18.00% 74.00% 8.00% 0.00% 60.84% 39.15% 0.00%
G 24.00% 8.00% 30.00% 38.00% 29.36% 27.66% 23.83% 19.15%
H 24% 8% 30% 38% 22.98% 42.98% 29.79% 4.26%

 

Table 2 identified patterns, themes and trends

Line managers

For line managers (50 responses), items C and G show stronger agreement, indicating higher levels of support or alignment with certain practices. In contrast, items E and F show significant disagreement, suggesting that some practices may not be perceived as beneficial or effective by line managers.

Employees

Employees (235 responses) exhibit different trends. For example, item E has a high “Strongly Agree” rate, indicating support among employees, while line managers largely disagreed. This suggests a disconnect between employee perceptions and managerial views.

Items A and B show stronger disagreement from employees than from line managers, hinting at employee dissatisfaction with certain aspects of management.

The benefits include:

While most managers felt secure in their abilities to assign ratings without interference or criticism, employees were only moderately on board.

Table 1 -3 Diagrammatic Representations

Pie Chart: Performance of Administration Department in Quarter 2

 

Pie Chart shows the performance distribution for the Administration Department in Quarter 2, with 10% of reviews marked as “Outstanding,” 40% as “Meets KPIs,” another 40% as “Not Quite There,” and 10% as “Underperforming.” This indicates a relatively balanced performance with room for improvement across different performance levels

Column Chart: Outstanding Performance by Department and Quarter

 

Compares the percentage of “Outstanding” performance by department across Quarter 1 and Quarter 2. Sales had 100% outstanding in Quarter 1, while R&D saw a significant increase in Quarter 2.

 

Horizontal Bar Chart: Underperforming Performance by Department and Quarter

Represents the “Underperforming” percentages by department across the two quarters. The Administration Department showed a reduction from 30% in Quarter 1 to 10% in Quarter 2, while Sales consistently had no underperforming scores.

 

Table 1 Recommendations

Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full