Solution

Task: Written Guidance

1.1 Employment Regulations’ Objectives

Employment law is the legislation that governs the rights and responsibilities of both employers and employees within a workplace. The main objectives include;

To protect employee rights and promote fair treatment at work. Laws such as the Employment Rights Act 1996 help achieve the aim of protecting employee rights and promoting fair treatment at work (Gov.UK. 1996). It achieves this by providing a minimum notice period for termination, regulating working time, and guaranteeing basic entitlements such as sick pay. The Act protects core rights like warnings for substantial changes in work duties or pay deductions.

Protecting rights is important for fair treatment and trust in the employer-employee relationship. It benefits workers by providing security and remedies for issues. However, it can be challenging for businesses to comply fully. Developing clearer guidance would help both parties.

To promote equality and prohibit discrimination- The Equality Act 2010 advances this aim, making it illegal to discriminate based on personal attributes when hiring, managing or dismissing staff. According to ‌ ACAS (2023), It requires employers to make reasonable adjustments for disabled workers. This fosters a more inclusive environment.

Promoting equality is vital to maximising talent and innovation through diversity. It benefits employers through access to a wider pool of skills and perspectives. Yet ensuring understanding across diverse cultures remains challenging. Unconscious bias training could strengthen inclusion.

To regulate the employment contract and relationship- Pieces of legislation like the Employment Relations Act 2000 support this aim by outlining the obligations of both employer and employee (New Zealand Legislation, 2020).  It establishes frameworks around contract terms such as wages, working hours, and holiday pay. Employers must abide by agreed terms to maintain orderly employment relations.

Regulating contracts is necessary to provide certainty for hiring and prevent disputes. It benefits both employers and workers through defined expectations. A challenge is keeping pace with new working patterns like freelancing. Expanding protections to non-traditional roles would future-proof the aim as work evolves.

  1.2 UK Court Systems

 In maintaining employment regulations, the tribunals and court system provide a legal structure for resolving disputes between employers and workers (CIPD, 2022).

Courts of Employment Tribunals- According to the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary (2023), issues such as unjust dismissal and discrimination can be brought before employment tribunals, which serve as the first stage in settling workplace disputes. Before rendering a final and binding ruling, the parties present their arguments before an employment judge. Anyone can take their case to the EAT, or Employment Appeal Tribunal. Procedural changes, such as digitization and virtual hearings, are examples of possible innovations. Alternative dispute resolution techniques, transparent rules, and impartial hearings are the hallmarks of best practices.

Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) – The EAT considers appeals from employment tribunals, according to GOV.UK (2023). Decisions are reviewed to identify any flaws related to process or law. Both ARL parties could seek redress from the EAT if they felt the tribunal had erred in its interpretation of the law. Decisions are either upheld, overturned, or varied by the EAT. Modifying the standards for appeals is one possible change. As the number of employees at ARL increases and new instances come up, it is important to follow fair and consistent standards. Clarifying employment rules is a crucial role of the EAT, which might help ARL and its workers.

The Court of Appeal and Supreme Court- A party can take their case to the Court of Appeal or, in rare instances, the Supreme Court if they are unhappy with the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s ruling (Judiciary 2023). Instead of re-examining the case’s facts, these higher courts focus on issues of law. To maintain uniformity in the application and interpretation of employment law, the Court of Appeal may, for instance, revisit an EAT ruling on a major legal matter.
Legal principles may be refined and clarified by landmark cases heard in the higher courts, which could lead to changes in this area of law. Judicial independence and the provision of decisions that are both clear and well-reasoned constitute best practices in the higher courts.

 1.3 Process in resolving an employment dispute in the UK;

The first stage is for the employee to notify their employer of their grievance in writing, clearly outlining the issues as evidenced by Davidson Morris (2020). The employer should hold a meeting to discuss the grievance and provide a written response. If the issue remains unresolved, the next formal stage is Early Conciliation with ACAS.

Early Conciliation is a mandatory consideration period where ACAS will work with both parties to resolve the dispute through conciliation. According to ‌Acas (2022), an ACAS conciliator acts as a neutral third party and their role is to facilitate discussions to reach a voluntary agreement. If no agreement is reached within one month of initial contact, an Early Conciliation Certificate (ECC), also called a COT3, will be issued allowing the matter to progress to a tribunal.

If issues remain unresolved after internal grievance and Early Conciliation, the worker has the option to file a claim with an Employment Tribunal. Claims must be submitted within three months minus one day of the act complained of as evidenced by ACAS (2020). ACAS may continue to offer conciliation after an ECC is issued up until the tribunal’s final hearing. The tribunal is a formal judicial body that will hold a preliminary hearing, a full hearing, and issue a judgment. Either party can appeal the tribunal’s decision. Tribunal claims involve submitting evidence in writing such as contemporaneous notes and witness statements to substantiate the case. Representation by a legal adviser is common but not mandatory.

Early conciliation provides a non-adversarial means to resolve disputes before entering into the formal tribunal process. ACAS plays a valuable role as an impartial third-party conciliator at both early and later stages of resolution. Throughout all stages, clear contemporaneous documentation is important for evidencing each party’s case.

  2.1 Principles of Discrimination Law

The 3 core principles of discrimination law established in the Equality Act 2010 provide a robust framework for protecting individuals from unfair treatment (The University of Nottingham, 2023).

Direct discrimination- The first principle of direct discrimination effectively prohibits less favorable treatment of someone due to a protected characteristic like age or disability.

Indirect discrimination- The second principle of indirect discrimination is aimed at practices and policies that disadvantage groups with protected traits, offering important protections even when no intent is present.

Harassment as the third principle captures behaviors violating dignity or creating intimidating environments, respecting individuals’ rights to feel secure. Taken together, these principles enshrined in the Equality Act 2010 form an intersectional set of protections that rightly ensure equal opportunity regardless of personal attributes (ACAS, 2023). By judiciously enforcing these three principles, the Act establishes Britain as a diverse and inclusive society committed to justice.

In line with the Equality Act of 2010, the primary piece of UK legislation safeguarding employees from discrimination, these principles seek to foster an inclusive and equitable work environment devoid of bias (ACAS, 2023). All phases of the employment life cycle, from posting openings to laying off workers, must comply with this law.

Key Features of Legislation

The Equality Act of 2010 is the principal piece of law that promotes equality and prohibits discrimination in the workplace. According to Netex (2017), nine attributes offer significant legal protections: age, handicap, gender reassignment, marriage partnership, maternity, ethnicity, religion/belief, sexuality, and sexual orientation. Companies are obligated to safeguard individuals with certain characteristics, ensure they receive appropriate accommodations for disabilities, and refrain from engaging in discriminatory policies or practices according to the Act. By providing a clear definition of unlawful discrimination and establishing courts for individuals, this historic legislation has ensured that recruiting is fair and inclusive. According to the Equality Act of 2010, the primary piece of legislation in the United Kingdom protecting citizens from discrimination, these principles establish a bias-free and welcoming work environment (ACAS, 2023). From job posting until termination, employers must follow this law.

Impacts of Law

According to Singh (2022), the recruitment process, candidate evaluation, and selection policies are all profoundly affected by the Equality Act of 2010.

Recruitment- Employers must not discriminate in job ads or applications. ARL must avoid favoring certain traits in its openings.
Selection- To avoid discrimination, only appropriate abilities, qualifications, and experience can be evaluated while hiring. Disabled applicants must be accommodated in interviews and tests. ARL could be sued for not providing Braille materials to blind candidates.
Employment- LLP (2021) shows that the Equality Act protects employees and requires reasonable workplace adaptations and religious observance. In violation of the Act, ARL may refuse to accommodate an employee’s request for prayer time. Protections against victimization and harassment in the workplace exist.
By way of recommendation, as an outside consultant, I would advise ARL to institute stringent policies prohibiting discrimination based on age, handicap, gender, religion, and other protected characteristics, and to provide comprehensive training for all newly hired managers. Claims may be limited by this guideline, as there has been an increase in pregnancy discrimination tribunals due to recent case law. Following the Equality Act’s guidelines will help ARL’s policies weather legislative changes in this crucial area.

  2.2 Features of the Equality Act

Gender Gap Pay

The Equality Act 2010 aims to protect people from discrimination in the workplace and in wider society. In terms of The Equal Pay Act of 1963 makes it illegal for employers to pay unequal wages to men and women who perform substantially equal work as evidenced by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2023). It helped establish the principle of equal pay for equal work. The Act requires that men and women in the same workplace be given equal pay for equal work. This law shields women from pay discrimination but does not address other aspects that contribute to the gender pay gap such as differences in seniority, rank, or job history.

Gender Gap Pay Reporting

In terms of gender gap pay reporting a more recent law helps address the gender pay gap through transparency. According to CIPD (2024), UK legislation enacted in 2017 mandates the disclosure of gender pay gap figures by corporations with at least 250 employees. This shines a light on average differences in the earnings of men and women, regardless of their roles or seniority. It reveals variability in women’s representation across different roles and pay grades. Public reporting puts pressure on employers and initiatives to reduce any gender pay gaps.

Equal Pay Claim

Employers can defend against equal pay claims by conducting regular pay audits to ensure men and women in the same or equivalent roles receive equal pay (ACAS, 2022). Jobs should be evaluated using consistent and objective job evaluation methods to determine their value or weight. Any pay differences must be justifiable, such as differences in qualifications, skills, or seniority rather than gender. Organisations should also ensure pay systems and decisions are transparent.

Conducting regular market benchmarking and gender-neutral pay reviews that assess employee performance, responsibilities, and career progression can help ARL identify any unjust or unexplained disparities. Taking action to address imbalances through adjustments can strengthen defenses against potential claims. Future legislation could extend gender pay reporting requirements to smaller companies and mandate action plans to remedy unjustifiable pay gaps, strengthening efforts to achieve equal pay for equal work.

  4.1 Statutory Rights

Kim (2023) points out that statutory rights are legal rights that are established by statute or legislation enacted by a government or legislative body. Statutory rights related to pay are;

Vacation time (or yearly leave). 

 An employee has a legal entitlement to vacation time per the Working Time Regulations of 1998. The majority of full-time workers are guaranteed 5.6 weeks of vacation pay per year by these statutes (or 28 days if calculated in days) (Legislation.gov.uk, 2020). This aims to ensure adequate rest and separation from work responsibilities. The regulations help balance professional commitments with personal life.

Sick Pay

The Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) framework governs statutory sick pay rights under the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992. According to ‌GOV.UK. (2023), this entitles eligible employed earners to receive £99.35 per week for up to 28 weeks if unable to work because of illness or injury. For the first 28 weeks of sickness absence, employers are responsible for paying SSP. This statutory right provides income protection for shorter-term health issues and supports recovery without long-term financial insecurity that could prolong absence.

Both these statutory protections are important employment rights to guarantee sufficient rest via annual leave as well as financial security and well-being support when health prevents working through statutory sick pay. They underpin fair labour standards in the UK by balancing duties and well-being both during employment and short-term leave from work due to sickness.

 3.1 The Law and Change Management

Flexible clauses

Flexible clauses are defined by ACAS (2023) as…

Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full