(Solution) Oakwood Level 5 5HR01 Employment relationship management Assessment ID / CIPD_5HR01_22_01

New User Gifts

First Order Deal get Ksh 200 Off.

KaribuCustomer

Original price was: $30.00.Current price is: $10.00.

Payment Methods:

Description

Solution

Section One – Questions

 

Review emerging developments to inform approaches to employee voice and engagement. (AC 1.1)

Word count: Approximately 300 words

 

Employee voice- Employee voice is the avenue for workers to share their perspectives and input with company leaders as evidenced by CIPD (2024). It creates a channel for ideas, concerns or suggestions to move from the employee level up to management. Having an effective voice mechanism fosters a sense of partnership within the organisation as employees feel their contributions and opinions are heard and respected throughout the company.

Recent trends in employee voice can significantly impact engagement, performance, and overall workplace well-being. For Go Quest, implementing direct participation and employee representation at the board level are two such trends that can enhance its employee relations.

Direct Participation: Encouraging direct participation involves involving employees in decision-making processes through regular meetings, feedback sessions, and suggestion schemes (Szelągowska-Rudzka, 2023). At Go Quest, this can lead to increased employee engagement, as workers feel valued and heard. For instance, incorporating regular team meetings where employees can voice their ideas on new adventure clothing designs could enhance creativity and innovation, directly benefiting the company’s growth.

Employee Representation at the Board Level: According to Workers-Practitioner. EU (2023), Including employee representatives on the board, can provide a direct channel for workforce concerns and suggestions to be heard at the highest decision-making level. This practice fosters transparency and trust. For Go Quest, having a board member who understands the employees’ perspectives can ensure that management decisions align with the workforce’s needs, promoting a positive work environment and enhancing job satisfaction.

To build employee engagement at Go Quest, direct participation and employee representation at the board level should be strategically implemented. Direct participation can be fostered through regular feedback sessions and inclusive decision-making processes, allowing employees to contribute ideas and feel valued as evidenced by Osborne and Hammoud (2017). This approach promotes a sense of ownership and belonging. Employee representation at the board level ensures that employees’ voices are heard in high-level decisions, enhancing transparency and trust.

 

 

Differentiate between employee involvement and employee participation and how it builds relationships. (AC 1.2)  Word count: Approximately 300 words

 

Differences

Employee involvement is a more basic approach that keeps employees informed about issues affecting their work but does not directly engage them in decision-making as evidenced by ‌ Gifford et al. (2015). Management may solicit some feedback and ideas from staff through simple communication tools like suggestion boxes. Employee participation, on the other hand, actively engages employees in more substantive and meaningful ways (Benn, et al. 2015). Workers are directly consulted on important decisions and changes that impact them through mechanisms like joint consultative committees. They have opportunities to provide input and influence outcomes rather than just receive information one way.

Example Of Employee Involvement

Joint Consultative Committee (JCC)- One example of employee involvement at Go Quest could be the establishment of a joint consultative committee (JCC). This committee, comprising representatives from both management and the union, allows employees to voice their opinions and contribute to decision-making processes (Barry et al. 2018). By actively involving employees in discussions about workplace policies, practices, and changes, the JCC can build strong and positive working relationships. This collaborative approach fosters a sense of ownership and trust, as employees feel their perspectives are valued and considered. It also enhances communication, reduces misunderstandings, and aligns goals between management and staff, leading to a more cohesive and motivated workforce.

Example Of Employee Participation

Regular Townhall Meetings- At Go Quest, implementing regular town hall meetings where employees can directly participate in discussions with senior management could significantly strengthen working relationships. These meetings provide a platform for employees to share ideas, express concerns, and offer feedback as evidenced by SHRM, (2023). By actively engaging employees in this manner, the company demonstrates that it values their input, fostering a sense of inclusion and respect. This participative approach enhances transparency, trust, and mutual understanding, leading to stronger, more positive working relationships. Employees feel more connected and committed to the organisation’s goals, improving overall morale and cooperation.

 

Assess a range of employee voice tools and approaches to drive employee engagement.

(3 tools and 2 approaches) (AC 1.3)  Word count: Approximately 400 words

 

Tools

Surveys are structured questionnaires distributed to employees to gather their opinions, feedback, and suggestions. According to CIPD (2021), they allow employees to share their thoughts anonymously, encouraging honest feedback. The strengths of surveys include their ability to reach a large number of employees and generate quantitative data for trend analysis. However, they may lack depth and context, and if not acted upon, can lead to employee skepticism and disengagement.

Town hall meetings are large, open forums where employees can engage directly with senior management, ask questions, and provide feedback as evidenced by Jamie (2024). These meetings foster engagement by promoting transparency and direct communication. The strengths of town hall meetings include building trust, encouraging open dialogue, and addressing issues in real-time. However, their effectiveness can be limited by time constraints, and shy employees may feel uncomfortable speaking up in a large group setting.

Employee forums are smaller, more focused discussion groups that allow employees to delve deeper into specific topics and provide detailed feedback (CIPD, 2023). They drive engagement by creating a more intimate and collaborative environment. The strengths of employee forums include fostering closer relationships, detailed discussions, and actionable insights. However, they can be time-consuming to organise and may not represent the views of the entire workforce if participation is limited.

By combining these tools, Go Quest can create a comprehensive approach to enhancing employee engagement.

Approaches to Driving Employee Engagement

Employee participation/involvement involves actively engaging employees in decision-making processes and giving them a voice in shaping workplace policies and practices. This approach fosters a sense of ownership and belonging, leading to increased motivation and commitment (Gimbal, 2023). Strengths of employee involvement include enhanced communication, improved trust between employees and management, and higher job satisfaction. However, it can be time-consuming to implement and may lead to decision-making delays if consensus is required.

Total reward packages encompass all the benefits, compensation, and rewards that an employee receives from their employer, including salary, bonuses, health benefits, retirement plans, and non-monetary perks like recognition programs and career development opportunities (Cotton, 2023). These packages drive engagement by addressing employees’ financial, professional, and personal needs, thus increasing their overall job satisfaction and loyalty. Strengths of total reward packages include attracting and retaining top talent, enhancing motivation through diverse incentives, and promoting a positive workplace culture. However, they can be costly to implement and maintain, and if not tailored to the specific needs and preferences of the workforce, may not effectively boost engagement.

 

 

Critically evaluate the interrelationships between employee voice and organisational performance.(AC 1.4) Word count: Approximately 250 words

 

Direct Participation:

Direct participation through town hall meetings at Go Quest enhances organisational performance by fostering transparency and open communication. Employees feel valued, leading to higher motivation and commitment ((Szelągowska-Rudzka, 2023). However, it can be resource-intensive to organise and may not capture diverse viewpoints if not managed inclusively.

Employee Representation at the Board Level: Employee representation ensures workforce perspectives influence strategic decisions, boosting morale and alignment with employee interests. Challenges include potential conflicts of interest and communication gaps between representatives and management.

Interrelationship with Organisational Performance: Both direct participation and board representation positively impact performance by enhancing engagement and decision quality. However, effective implementation is critical to overcoming logistical challenges and ensuring inclusivity. Balancing employee input with organisational efficiency is key to leveraging these strategies for sustained performance improvement at Go Quest. Both forms of employee voice can enhance organisational performance by improving employee morale, commitment, and decision-making quality (Workers-Practitioner. EU, 2023). However, their effectiveness depends on how well they are implemented, managed, and integrated into the company’s overall strategy and culture.

Balanced argument: Implementing employee voice mechanisms like town hall meetings and employee forums at Go Quest can enhance engagement and performance by fostering transparency and inclusivity. However, effective implementation requires addressing logistical challenges and ensuring all voices are heard to maximise their impact on organisational success.

 

Explain the concept of better working lives and how this can be designed. (AC 1.5)

Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Word count: Approximately 250 words

 

Better working lives refers to efforts by organisations to improve the overall quality of employees’ working experience and well-being in the workplace beyond a basic work-life balance as evidenced by Acas (2020). It focuses on enhancing job satisfaction, involvement, health, learning and development opportunities, effective voice mechanisms, reasonable workload pressures and a supportive work culture. The goal is to promote a more positive working environment where people are engaged and productive.

Example of how pay/benefits and health & safety could help design a better working life at Go Quest include:

Pay and benefits

Pelago (2024) points out that pay and benefits are fundamental to employees’ working experience. Go Quest could work with unions to review wage levels and ensure they are fair and competitive and keeping up with the cost of living. Introducing benefits like sick pay, life insurance and an enhanced pension plan would enhance financial security. A generous employee discount on company products could boost morale.

Health and safety

Health and safety is equally important given the nature of manufacturing clothing. Go Quest must protect workers by identifying hazards, training staff on protocols, and providing appropriate protective equipment. Regular workstation assessments and safety audits would mitigate risks. An active health and wellbeing program including ergonomic assessments, physical activity classes, stress management workshops and annual flu shots would demonstrate care for staff wellbeing (Comcare, 2023). If implemented effectively based on employee feedback, such policies and programs would help improve working conditions and quality of work at Go Quest.

 

 

Section Two

This section of the report needs to provide understanding to Go Quest’s managers on the different forms of conflict behaviour and dispute resolution and how to manage performance, disciplinary and grievance matters lawfully. You need to:

 

  • Distinguish between organisational conflict and misbehaviour, and between informal and formal conflict. (AC 2.1)

 

  • Distinguish between official and unofficial employee action. (AC 2.2)

 

  • Assess emerging trends in the types of conflict and industrial sanctions. (AC 2.3)

 

  • Distinguish between third-party conciliation, mediation and arbitration. (AC 2.4)

 

  • Explain the principles of legislation relating to unfair dismissal in respect of capability and misconduct issues. (AC 3.1)

 

  • Analyse key causes of employee grievances. (AC 3.2)

 

  • Explain the skills required for effective grievance and discipline-handling procedures. (AC 3.3)

 

  • Advise on the importance of handling grievances effectively. (AC 3.4)

 

  • Explain the main provisions of collective employment law. (AC 4.1)

 

  • Compare the types of employee bodies, union and non-union forms of employee representation. (AC 4.2)

 

  • Evaluate the purpose of collective bargaining and how it works. (AC 4.3)

 

SECTION TWO

Your evidence must consist of:

§  Written responses to each of the 11 instructions above.

§  Approximately 2400 words in total, refer to CIPD word count policy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Section Two – Questions

 

Distinguish between organisational conflict and misbehaviour, and between informal and formal conflict. (AC 2.1) Word count: Approximately 250 words

 

Please click the following icon to access this assessment in full